Skip to main content

Germany is forgetting the lessons of history as it votes for eugenics

What is it that made the Nazi regime 'evil'? Was it only the mass slaughter of the Jews? Was it the military destruction that it brought to all of Europe?

I contend the fact that they were able to commit these atrocities was the logical conclusion to 'redefining' what it was to be a 'person' under the law. Germans, even in the 30's and 40's, were too sophisticated a nation to have accepted such patent evils against others who had previously been their neighbors and fellow citizens without 'conditioning'. To achieve such a terrible fact the population had to be convinced of the 'rightness' of such  heinous acts. Creating an acceptable zeitgeist which rationalized genocide, began as a necessary first step by opening people up to the possibility that they deserved to be viewed as being genetically 'superior' to others. It was necessary to convince people that what was evil was good was as a necessary first step.  Being able to establish the 'WE' vs 'THEM' paradigm ... with 'THEM' (the Jews, handicapped, infirm etc.) being 'scientifically' demonstrably inferior was the goal the Nazi propaganda machine set about promoting.

In the language of Eugenics, the disabled or genetic imperfect being less worthy of life when compared to the able bodied, it is a short journey from "I wouldn't want to live like that", to "people wouldn't want to live like that" before arriving at "they shouldn't be allowed to live". It is the application of the Neuhaus Principle: that which is first permitted will soon become compulsory. It was the way that exposed the Jews  to the holocaust. It is the way that the Germans are apparently starting to walk once again... at least according to the author of the source article.

What's your opinion?



John Smeaton, SPUC director: Germany is forgetting the lessons of history as it votes for eugenics

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Good will to all men? Not from the grumpy atheists! (Thank God not all atheists are grumpy but there sure seems to be a lot of them)

Why is it that so many in the atheist community cannot bring  themselves to get past their anger whenever they engage in discussions? The language of many of their contributions in public debate is laced with invective and dripping with sarcasm and bile. There are exceptions of course, but they tend to fall more into the category of being the 'exception that proves the rule' when compared to the hostility of many of today's atheist posters. Comment offered by the theists in the public square is often depicted as being 'malicious' or 'venomous' and intended to enslave the 'feeble minded and weak' by those who post. Nothing could be further from the truth. Venom is something that is oriented to death. Christians are oriented in a 180 degree different direction. We speak not to the culture of death  that grips our world but rather for the culture of life and light which ends with the gift of eternal life. For example, the Catholic Church in its hum...