Skip to main content

End-of-life debate turns to newborns: ‘Postnatal abortion’ morally acceptable in some cases, ethicist says | National Post

Another demonstration of the creeping culture of death. The previous article says that it’s OK to deny health care procedures designed to ‘prolong life’ after attaining the age of 75 or older. This one argues that we should terminate the life of children born with severe handicaps a.k.a. ‘post-natal abortions’.

Still think that we pro-lifers are exaggerating when we assert that life is being threatened at both ends of the spectrum? Sadly, stories like these make it clear that we’re not.
End-of-life debate turns to newborns: ‘Postnatal abortion’ morally acceptable in some cases, ethicist says | National Post

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Good will to all men? Not from the grumpy atheists! (Thank God not all atheists are grumpy but there sure seems to be a lot of them)

Why is it that so many in the atheist community cannot bring  themselves to get past their anger whenever they engage in discussions? The language of many of their contributions in public debate is laced with invective and dripping with sarcasm and bile. There are exceptions of course, but they tend to fall more into the category of being the 'exception that proves the rule' when compared to the hostility of many of today's atheist posters. Comment offered by the theists in the public square is often depicted as being 'malicious' or 'venomous' and intended to enslave the 'feeble minded and weak' by those who post. Nothing could be further from the truth. Venom is something that is oriented to death. Christians are oriented in a 180 degree different direction. We speak not to the culture of death  that grips our world but rather for the culture of life and light which ends with the gift of eternal life. For example, the Catholic Church in its hum...
105 comments
Read more