Book Review: 'How the West really Lost God: A New Theory of Secularization' by Mary Eberstadt (Templeton Press; West Conshohocken, PA) 2013
If you were asked to answer the question
“What happened to religious practice among industrialized nations over the past
100 years?” how would you respond? Most people from academics and religious
leaders like Pope Benedict XVI to the leaders of the New Atheist Movement would
probably point to the influence of secularist societies as being responsible
for bringing about the demise of faith. This proposition is so widely held
among people that it is considered to be conventional wisdom: a premise that is
self-evident. Mary Eberstadt, in her recent book ‘How the West Really Lost God:
A New Theory of Secularization’(Templeton Press; West Conshohocken, PA) 2013, turns such ‘wisdom’ on its head. She points
instead to the breakdown of family life and values as being the responsible
culprit that emptied out churches. Her argument is compelling both in the
evidence she provides and from in its internal logic; a logic understood as one
who is actually familiar with the issue from the perspective of both a believer
and an academic.
The first task she sets herself to is
examining what forces or circumstances are actually accountable for
secularism’s ascent to prominence throughout the West. In the process, she
demolishes the (again conventional) wisdom that it rose and ascended due to the
writings of Enlightenment sophists such as Voltaire. Next she shreds apart the
argument that secularism is the logical outgrowth of the ascendancy of the
natural sciences. To do this, she makes judicious use of that popular trope
(oft times wielded by atheists against believers) that ‘correlation is not the
same thing as causation’. In the process, she demonstrates the unsubstantiated
assumptions upon which the secularist position rests. Put plainly, she
questions that just because science and/or liberal democracies flourished at
the same time as religion began to wane doesn’t necessarily signify that the
former truly caused the latter. While each had an important role to play,
Eberstadt points out that they cannot actually account for all the changes that
have befallen churches in our time.
Leading the reader through numerous studies
and sociological articles, Eberstadt presents a persuasive and cogent argument
that it has in fact been the decline in family life throughout the West that
bears the greater responsibility for the current demise of religion today.
While no one piece of evidence in itself proves her argument, she weaves
together a strong albeit circumstantial case from a multiplicity of published
research papers to show that the ‘family factor’ merits more responsibility for
the change than does secularism or science. This is to say that the family
factor rather than secularism or science best explains the bulk of evidence
amassed by academics and writers since the Enlightenment.
Why is this conclusion so essential for the
Church today? It’s because if the Church continues to fall prey to the argument
that secularism and/or science are responsible for the decline in religious
practice, she will expend her energies confronting the wrong enemy! Rather than
engaging in the ongoing cultural wars currently afflicting western democracies
which serves only to alienate people from the Church, Eberstadt argues that it
is by addressing the issue of the ongoing disintegration of traditional family
structures that the Church can actually begin to turn the tide in its favor.
‘How the West Really Lost God’ by Mary
Eberstadt is definitely required reading for anyone interested in participating
in the ‘New Evangelization’ project that Catholics are being called upon to
enact.
Fr. Tim. First of all, good review. These add a lot of good content to your web site. I haven't read the book but I was wondering if claiming the the decline of family in Western society is responsible for growing non religiosity does that mean that non religious families or non traditional families have degraded family life?
ReplyDeleteMichael: Not at all. She isn't talking so much about the religiosity of families so much as she is addressing the general breakdown in family structures and family life being responsible for the decline.
DeleteFr. Tim
Personally I attribute much of the decline in the west to families not eating dinner together, or playing games together or generally talking together. So many of my son's friends hardly ever interact as a family and retreat to their digital divides..
DeleteI read the book and it is excellent, while many scholars would disagree with her, she makes a solid case as to why the breakup of the family unit plays a vital role in stabilizing society and also how good family life turns people back to God.
ReplyDeleteWorthwhile read, it is available on Kindle as well!
Cliff