I personally found that review something odd but not as odd as the "scientific" show which hammered on in it's first episode of the potentiality of something you could define as god. I find there to be a massive leap from the possibility of there being a god and than the properties that all religions give it/him/her. There is one thing assuming there is a god, there is another claiming there to be without any verification, of course. What I find the bloodiest is the massive claim and than assertions of properties without any authentication what so ever as we have within our "great" religions today. As I've written this I look to the left of the screen an find an odd counter which I have trouble with authenticating.. can you?
Posts
I personally found that review something odd but not as odd as the "scientific" show which hammered on in it's first episode of the potentiality of something you could define as god. I find there to be a massive leap from the possibility of there being a god and than the properties that all religions give it/him/her. There is one thing assuming there is a god, there is another claiming there to be without any verification, of course. What I find the bloodiest is the massive claim and than assertions of properties without any authentication what so ever as we have within our "great" religions today. As I've written this I look to the left of the screen an find an odd counter which I have trouble with authenticating.. can you?
ReplyDelete