Reflections from the pastoral ministry of an Evangelical Catholic Priest.
04 August, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Favorite Links
- American Papist Blog
- American Spectator
- Archbishop Tim Dolan's (NY) Blog
- Big Blue Wave
- Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC News Site)
- Catholic Dialogue Blog
- Catholic Education Resource Center
- Catholic Exchange
- Catholic Heritage Website (Ireland)
- Catholic Insight
- Catholic News Agency
- Catholic Online
- Catholic Sensibility
- Catholic, and Loving It
- CTV News Site
- Ethics and Public Policy Center
- First Things
- Fr. Raymond De Souza - National Post Columnist
- Fr. Raymond deSouza personal blog
- Freethroughthought blog (excellent site)
- Friar Rick's Webblog
- Get Religion.org
- Global TV News Site
- Holy Post - National Post Religious Blog
- Inside Catholic Blog
- LifeSiteNews
- New Advent
- Pave the Way Foundation
- Priests for Life Canada Website
- ProLife Blog
- Roman Catholic Diocese of Pembroke
- Rosary for the Bishops
- Salt & Light TV - Canadian Catholic Television Website
- Sandro Magister
- Sane Conservatism
- SoCon (social conservative)
- Sylvia's Website: Canadian Clergy Sex Abuse Cases
- The Catholic Register
- The Hermeneutic of Continuity
- The National Post: Canada's National Daily
- The New Jesuit Review
- The New York Times Website
- Vox Nova
- What Does Prayer Really Say - Priest bolg
- Whispers in the Loggia

Blog Archive
-
▼
2011
(1437)
-
▼
August
(88)
- Myth Buster: Constantine Founded the Catholic Chur...
- Abuse victim ‘hurt’ by confession stance
- Catholic League on ban against clergy during NYC 9...
- 5 Things You Need to Know About The Catholic Churc...
- In Defense of Sirico, Weigel, and Novak | Regnum N...
- Young Guns | VirtuousPla.net
- Quebec doctor probes possible autism, in-vitro fer...
- A request for prayers for a departed priest
- A priest’s nightmare | Fr. Z's Blog – What Does Th...
- Natural disasters a warning to D.C. - Alexander Bu...
- American Theocracy Revisited - NYTimes.com
- Handwriting through the ages: An abridged history ...
- Youtube video produced at the outfitter's camp whe...
- The source of virtue is divine: David Warren's lat...
- Meet ten amazing young Catholics | CatholicHerald....
- Conrad Black: The consolation of holy wisdom | Ful...
- 'Ancient Aliens' Suggests Catholic Rituals Might H...
- Gone for a few days. Back on the 26th!!
- 10 things the Belief Blog learned in its first yea...
- The real story of World Youth Day
- Pope urges pilgrims in Spain to spread faith - Wor...
- Americans Have Lost Faith In Religious Leaders And...
- HOW PSYCHOTHERAPISTS HELPED SEND AN INNOCENT PRIES...
- Planned Parenthood to end abortions at 7 Arizona s...
- Pope to proclaim St John of Avila Doctor of the Un...
- WAY TOO CUTE!!! Kitten vs Dog
- An essential point in how to remember when dealing...
- The most important thing I will ever write on this...
- What Happens When a Bishop Actually Stands Up for ...
- An interesting explanation how auxiliary (and othe...
- The seal of confession and the virtue of religion
- Why does God allow suffering?
- Is shacking up bad for the kids? - The Globe and M...
- Boulder left by mayor in front of ex-wife's home r...
- Ron Paul casts himself as the American messiah in ...
- I now pronounce you, Bert, and you, Ernie – nope, ...
- Feast of the Assumption | Catholic Exchange
- Groundbreaking series on Catholicism to air on PBS...
- Bishops Criticize Tough Alabama Immigration Law - ...
- Appreciating Darwin Has Evolved | Daily News | NCR...
- The seal of confession: some basics
- DNA components made in asteroids, study suggests -...
- Antimatter belt surrounds Earth - Technology & Sci...
- NASA probe to asteroid begins collecting data - CT...
- Jesus and the “Ogre” | First Things
- Dumb Luck or Design? A Meditation on the Existence...
- Does a parish priest have time to blog?
- New Philadelphia archbishop says church singled ou...
- Muslims Attack Christian Village in Egypt -- 1 Mur...
- Defiant Fr Roy Bourgeois Dismissed from Maryknolls...
- Violence, Riots and Anarchy Continue in London, Ar...
- TSX, Dow losses deepen - Business - CBC News
- Why companies won't hire - CNN.com
- In a Jerusalem tunnel, a glimpse of an ancient war...
- Catholic Irish priest still finds great joy and fu...
- Is this the Vatican's twilight?
- Marriage and the Law of Supply and Demand - NYTime...
- We can only watch: A reflection from David Warren ...
- Poll shows 56 per cent of Canadians think immigran...
- Do we have a 'right' to die?
- Thoughts on the arrest of Linda Gibbons on Aug. 4,...
- What is ‘Roman Catholic Political Philosophy’? » F...
- Pondering and Parsing Pithy Sayings | Archdiocese ...
- Pornography’s Social Cost
- Yes, there is such a thing as an unborn baby
- Sorry, Mr Weigel: the Irish Church has problems, b...
- If The Protestant Canon Were True… | St. Joseph's ...
- Is Catholicism in the United States healthy or in ...
- No Homophobia - George Weigel - National Review On...
- Livingston man should not be hassled for wooden cr...
- What Every Catholic Needs to Know about witnessing...
- Are Biblical Laws About Homosexuality Eternal?
- Rate your priest on new Website - The West Austral...
- Ion-powered Dawn begins study of asteroid Vesta | ...
- Book Review: The Church and the New Media | St. Jo...
- Calling things by their proper names
- Professional Scientist and Amateur Philosopher Ste...
- RNS Blog: "Tuesday’s Religion News Roundup"
- We Called For the Priest and He Never Came – A Ref...
- Losing track | Sylvia's Site
- More on the Irish Scandal from the Emerald Isle he...
- Ireland and the Church
- FLASH! Fr. Z agrees with the Huffington Post. Immi...
- Preserving Our Faith: +Dolan (NY) answers the crie...
- "Non Prævalebunt." How and Why Benedict XVI Is Sta...
- I absolutely love this joke! After all, if we can'...
- Winehouse, Breivik and Deadly Ideals - NYTimes.com...
-
▼
August
(88)

I dislike the term homophobia and agree that it's use is a way to silence critics. That said the rest of this article by George Weigel was nonsensical. Because the Church does not agree with the state's definition of marriage to include same sex couples does not marginalize the Church any more than it not agreeing with marrying divorced Catholics. I think Mr. Weigel is desparate to find reasons to disapprove of the state enacting a law that in no way affects him or his fellow Catholics. Michael
ReplyDeleteUtter. Incoherent. Drivel.
ReplyDeleteFirstly, the passage of equal marriage in NY did not require one to obtain both a civil and a religious marriage. It certainly did not mean that in Ontario.
Secondly, even if it did, how does this make the US a totalitarian state? Communist Poland also required vehicle registrations, does this mean Ontario is a totalitarian state as well? I fail to follow Mr. Weigels logic here. Seems like a foolish attempt on his part to simply smear progressive states by using the weakest "guilt by association" argument that I have witnessed in some time.
Lastly, how does equal marriage negatively impact anyone's religious rights?
Seems equal marriage is actually expanding religious freedom and not constraining it. For example, if I belong to a religion that permits marriage between same sex individuals - I now have the liberty to have my marriage recognized by the state. Similarly, if I have no religion at all - I am free to seek equal a marriage license directly from the state.
"Orthodox Christians" seem quite content to allow married couples to obtain civil divorces - even though divorce may offend their notion of what is permitted within the boundaries of their sect. Why then do they insist that the state deny equal marriage? This is simply inconsistent and Weigel breezes right past this inherent contradiction as he contorts his thinking to support his personal biases regarding marriage and gays.
Rarely have I seen such incoherence on public display.
Cheers...Martin
Martin, exactly. Mr. Weigel is known to be a rather intelligent, rational individual. Has the prospect of gay marriage that in no way affects him or his church unhinced him that completely that he would publish and article such as this? Or is this the only attack on same sex marriage that is left to its opponents? In which case the battle for same sex marriage is won. Michael
ReplyDeleteMarriage by its very definition is between a man and a woman.That the State has decided to change that definition does not make it so.I have no problem with those who want to engage in sexual activity with a person of the same sex.That is their choice.But I don't have to agree with it nor do I have to support it in word or deed.
ReplyDeleteIf people want to have official papers showing their relationship is accepted by the State then that is the business of the State but it is a sin.
Therin lies the problem. Catholics call this action of same sex a sin. Therefore oppose it because it is a sin.
And it does affect the tradional concept of marriage because the law will now determine that socially,financially and legally same sex couples have the same if not greater rights than tradional marriages.
I have no problem with people wanting to have sex with each other provided I have the right to object to it because I see it as a grave sin that has consequences for those engaged in such acts morally and physically.
My dearest Anonymous - simply asserting that the definition of marriage is "between a man and a woman" does not make it so either. Sneeking your conclusion into your defintion is hardly a valid argument.
ReplyDeleteI have no problems with Catholics defining the "sacrament of marriage" in any way they see fit. In fact, most folks who self-identify as Catholic could not care less about the "rules". For example, most Catholics break at least one of these rules (or commit a sin if you prefer): a) no pre-marital sex, b) no cohabitation prior to marriage, c) no use of contraceptives, d) no obtaining an abortion, e) no obtaining a divorce etc... etc...
Why is it that you feel that enshrining your personal religious belief in law about equal marriage is justified, while you apparently ignore all of these other sins permitted by the law?
Do you think our secular laws should be based solely on one sect's religious views? If so, which sect and why?
What happens when 2 sects disagree on a law?
Whose religious view should take precedence over another? What principles will the state utlize to separate the "true" religion from the less true religions?
Be careful what you wish for Anonymous - a theocratic foundation to the civil law is a slippery slope indeed. You might just find yourself with less religious liberty instead of more when you invite the state to decide which religous view is the correct religious view.
Cheers...Martin
Thank you Martin. Because Catholics do not obey church laws re abortion,pre-marital sex etc is no the issue.The discussion is about marriage and how it is defined.You will agree I'm sure that from earliest times 'home-making' was carried on between a man and a woman for the good of society.My only point was that because a government decides another way does not change the basic truth of what marriage is all about.
ReplyDeleteAnd speaking of the slippery slope.Already those who disagree with same-sex unions are unable to keep their jobs if that job relates to 'marriage'.The state has already decided that in most instances one must agree with same-sex unions and teach that such unions are good.
The natural law has taken quite a beating of late but that is a topic for another time.
Thank you for your reply.
"Marriage by its very definition is between a man and a woman."
ReplyDeletePhfffft*** "Marriage" means a blending, a combining. Gender has NOTHING to do with it.
"Catholics call this action of same sex a sin. Therefore oppose it because it is a sin."
The concept of "sin" is important only to those who believe in it. Catholics are quite free to oppose it for themselves, but they are NOT free to oppose it for anyone else. And not all Catholics are opposed to same sex marriage, either.
"And it does affect the tradional concept of marriage because the law will now determine that socially,financially and legally same sex couples have the same if not greater rights than tradional marriages."
Equal rights, yes; not greater. And so what? How are you being harmed by your gay neighbor's marriage?
"...I see it as a grave sin..."
That is entirely YOUR problem. No one else wants it.
Dear Lady Janus:
ReplyDeleteSorry but blending etc has everything to do with marriage and gender is what makes the world go round and what makes for marriage's reality.
And yes, we are harmed by the actions of our neighbours in this regard.
More diseases and family problems because we have agreed to go against what is natural.
And grave sin is not just MY problem. Murder,rape,robbery etc is everyone's problem as are the consequences of the misuse of the sexual drive.
Have a relaxing week-end
The Catholic Church defines marriage as indisolvable. Yet the state allows divorce and remarriage. The Catholic Church forbids marriage between a couple that is living together, yet the state allows this. The state allows marriage for a couple who've announced they are not wanting children, yet the state allows this. Where's the protest against society redefining marriage in these cases? Michael
ReplyDelete"Sorry but blending etc has everything to do with marriage..."
ReplyDeleteThat's what I said. Pay attention.
"...and gender is what makes the world go round..."
Oh, gee...and here I thought it was gyroscopic precession...
"...and what makes for marriage's reality."
Got news for ya...everyone has their own reality, and if same sex marriage is part of it, then that is true for them.
"And yes, we are harmed by the actions of our neighbours in this regard."
Oh, balls. You're not injured in any way. Your very sensitive religiosity is offended by the choices freely made by those who do not share your religion and values, but you're not being harmed at all.
And yeah, it IS your problem. It sure ain't mine.
Are you harmed by a non Catholic neighbour who remarries? If not, why not, and if so why aren't you demanding that the Catholic view of marriage indissolubility be made normative for all? Michael
ReplyDeleteAre you harmed by a non Catholic neighbour who remarries? If not, why not, and if so why aren't you demanding that the Catholic view of marriage indissolubility be made normative for all?
ReplyDeleteHi Michael
I think we are harmed by our neighbours failed marriages and remarriages. Unless of course you don't believe there are adverse affects on children emotionally, socially and even financially when parents go their separate ways, often one hostile to the other.There are plenty of damaged children and adults as a direct result of failed marriages and the introduction of step mom or dad into the equation.
Of course if no children are involved it lessons the collateral damage.
Cheers
Paul
Cheers
Paul